Thursday, June 30, 2016

BUHARI, OSINBAJO MEET SERVICE CHIEFS

Niger Delta: Buhari, Osinbajo meet service chiefs — 1st July 2016 From Juliana Taiwo-Obalonye, Abuja President Muhammadu Buhari and Vice President Yemi Osinbajo yesterday held a closed door meeting with Service Chiefs and other heads of security agencies in the country. The meeting reportedly reviewed military operations in the Niger Delta region and the ongoing anti-terrorism war in the North-East. None of those who attended the meeting, which lasted over three hours, agreed to take questions from State House correspondents when approached. Those who attended the meeting included the Chief of Defence Staff, Gabriel Olonisakin; Chief of Army Staff, Tukur Buratai; Chief of Air Staff, Air Marshal Sadique Abubakar; Chief of Naval Staff, Ibok-Ete Ibas; Director General of the Department of State Services, Lawal Daura; Director General, National Intelligence Agency, Mr. Ayo Oke; and the acting Inspector General of Police, Mr. Ibrahim Idris. Also in the meeting were Minister of Defence, Brigadier General Mansur Dan Ali (retd); National Security Adviser, Major General Babagana Munguno (retd.); Secretary to the Government of the Federation, Mr. Babachir Lawal and the Chief of Staff to the President, Mr. Abba Kyari. Olonisakin quickly moved to his waiting car as he came out of the venue of the meeting. When Buratai was approached for comment, he directed journalists to the CDS who was already driven out of the premises. No official statement was issued on either the agenda or outcome of the meeting.

I NEC, PDP ASK COURT TO DISMISS SUIT ON ANAMBRA PDP PRIMARIES

INEC, PDP ask court to dismiss suit on Anambra PDP primaries — 30th June 2016 From Godwin Tsa, Abuja THE Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) and the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), have asked the Federal Court sitting in Abuja to dismiss the suit challenging the validity of the primary election of the party that produced senators Andy Ubah, Stella Oduah and others as candidates for the 2015 National Assembly elections. The respondents are contending that the suit insti­tuted by Senator Annie Okonkwo and 43 others consti­tute a gross abuse of the court. They hinged their position on the claim that the is­sues raised by the plaintiffs had already been decided by the Supreme Court. In the suit in contention, Okonkwo and 43 others had, through their counsel, Chief Asam Asam dragged INEC, Ubah, Oduah and 16 others who are lawmakers in the National and Anambra State houses of assembly before the Federal High Court praying the court to in­validate the nomination of the defendants. In addition, the plaintiffs applied for an order of the court restraining INEC from accepting the nomination of Ubah and his colleagues in the national and state as­semblies on the ground that they were not nominated by the state executive committee of PDP led by Mr. Ejike Oguebegu. It is their claim that since Oguebegu-led state PDP committee conducted primary election, nominated them and their names published by INEC, it was wrong in law for their names to be withdrawn from INEC’s list

MAYHEM IN LAGOS :ONE KILLED, 14 BRT BUSES DESTROYED AS HAWKERS, KAI OFFICIALS CLASH

Mayhem in Lagos:  One killed, 14 BRT buses destroyed as hawkers, KAI officials clash — 30th June 2016 By Christopher Oji THERE was pandemonium yesterday at Maryland on Ikorodu Road, Lagos as street hawkers protested the killing of one of them by a truck. The deceased was fleeing from the officials of Kick Against Indiscipline (KAI) who were arresting street traders on the highway. At least, 14 vehicles be­longing to the Bus Rapid Transport (BRT) and that of the Rapid Response Squad (RRS) of the Lagos State Police Command were destroyed. A witness, Ebuka Izuegbune, said: “At about 12.30pm, we were at the BRT bus-stop, when we saw KAI of­ficials with some policemen chasing street hawkers. One of them was knocked down by the truck. “The man died instantly. His colleagues went on the rampage, smashing vehicles, especially gov­ernment-owned. They smashed BRT buses and police vans. “Some hoodlums hijacked the clash, robbed passers-by, Quick in­tervention of RRS men led by their Commander, Mr Tunji Disu, saved the situation. The police wanted to remove the body, but they were prevented from doing so, until the policemen dispersed them with tear gas.” A senior police officer, who spoke on condition of anonymity said: “The KAI officials were doing their legitimate duty when the hawkers started running away. Unfortunate­ly, one of them ran into a moving vehicle and was crushed. The other hawkers went berserk and started destroying vehicles. “When we got a distress call, we wanted to remove the body, because, that would have been the first and proper thing to do, but we were pre­vented from doing so. We called for more men and the RRS Commander came in full force and dispersed the hoodlums with tear gas. That was how we were able to remove the body which had been deposited at the mortuary. “We have arrested five persons in connection with the public distur­bance. We have moved the damaged BRT buses to the Lagos State Traffic Management Agency (LASTMA) of­fice. The truck that crushed the vic­tim is in our custody too,” he said. A hawker, Ikechukwu Okoro­afor, said: “We are being treated like animals in Lagos. We have refused to go into crime, yet, they wouldn’t let us be. How does the government want us to survive? We have not committed any crime ,but looking for our daily bread. Let the state government enforce the law on prohibition on commercial motorcycle riders (Okada). The Okada riders on our express roads are all northerners, armed with daggers and other dangerous weapons. The police are afraid of them, but they are af­ter us because, we are not armed.” As a result of the clash, there was traffic gridlock and passengers were stranded as commercial bus drivers avoided the route for fear of their vehicles being vandalised by the rampaging hawkers. The state Police Public Relations Officer (PPRO) Dolapo Badmos, who confirmed the incident, said: “KAI officials were enforcing the order against street hawking and the hawkers were fleeing to evade arrest, in the process, one of them was crushed by a moving vehicle.” Reacting, Mr Fola Tinubu, the BRT operator, Managing Director, Primero Ltd, expressed displea­sure over the vandalisation of the buses. “We don’t know what happened, whatever it is; it is something that has to do with the government or the police. “But does that give aggrieved people the right to destroy private property. “People are saying that there are no jobs in Nigeria; we have cre­ated over 2,000 jobs in the last six months. Is this the reward we will get for it? “We need to start asking our­selves serious questions in this country. “They have destroyed over 14 of our buses now. I don’t even know how many they have de­stroyed now. For what, what did we do; I am angry. “I don’t even know where to begin because there is no justi­fication for destroying private property; our service is for the masses. “Do you know how many peo­ple would be stranded today if we don’t go out to pick them up? “How are they going to get home? We do this for the masses. Is this the reward that we will get? This is madness.”

EFCC ARRAIGNS EX-CHIEF OF AIR STAFF AMOSU,3 OTHERS OVER N22.8BN ALLEGED FRAUD

EFCC arraigns ex-Chief of Air Staff, Amosu, 2 others over N22.8bn alleged fraud — 30th June 2016 By Lukman Olabiyi THE Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) yes­terday arraigned a former Chief of Air Staff, Air Marshal Adesola Amosu Nunayon (retd), two senior serving Air Force officers and eight companies before the Federal High Court, Lagos on 23-count charge of fraud, money laundering and steal­ing. The two serving senior Air Force Officers docked alongside Amosu are Air Vice Marshal Jacob Bola Adigun, and Air Commodore Gbadebo Owodunni Olugbenga. The companies are Delfina Oil and Gas Limited, McAllan Oil and Gas Limited, Hebron Housing and Prop­erties Company Limited, Trapezitrs Bureau De Change (TBDC), Fonds and Pricey Limited, Deegee Oil and Gas Limited, Timsegg Investment Limited, and Solomon Health Care Limited. They allegedly committed the of­fences between March 5, 2014, and May 4, 2015. The three officers allegedly con­verted several billions of Naira be­longing to the Nigeria Air Force (NAF) to their personal use. According to the charge, the ac­converted N21,467,634,707.43, property of the Air Force, which sum was derived from stealing to their personal use.cused persons were alleged to have They were also alleged to have between May 5, 2014 and May 4, 2015 in Lagos, indirectly convert­ed N5, 291, 306, 950.28, property of the Nigerian Air Force to their personal use. Amosu, Adigun and Olugbenga, allegedly between July 17 and Sep­tember 16, 2014, used the Brit­ish Pounds Sterling equivalent of N663, 443,291, removed from the accounts of the Nigerian Air Force to purchase for themselves two properties at 50-52 Tenterden Grove, London (NW41TH) and 93B Shirehall Park, London NW4 2QU, United Kingdom. The offences according to the EFCC prosecutor, Rotimi Oyede­po, are contrary to Sections 18(a) of the Money Laundering (Prohi­bition) (Amendment) Act, 2012, and punishable under Section 15(3) of the same Act. They pleaded not guilty. The prosecutor urged the court for accelerated hearing, and also ap­plied that the accused persons be remanded in prison custody pending the determination of the charge. However, defence lawyers, Mr. Bolaji Ayorinde (SAN), Mr. Norris Quakers (SAN), and A. Etuokwu, urged the court to ignore the ap­plication and prayed the court to hear the bail applications of the accused persons. However, the prosecution did not oppose the bail application of their clients. Justice Muhammed Idris grant­ed bail to each of the accused per­son for N500 million with two sureties. “ The sureties must be property owners within the jurisdiction of the court, and title documents of the properties must be submit­ted to the court’s Registrar, which must be verified by the EFCC.” Justice Idris ordered that the sureties must sworn to affidavit of means which must be verified by the EFCC. Justice Idris adjourned the mat­ter to July 8 for trial. The court or­dered that Amosu and Olugbenga be remanded in prisons custody, while Adigun be kept at EFCC’s custody, because of his state of health, pending the perfection of their bail conditions.

MILITARY KILLS 4 KIDNAPPERS,RESCUES 3 VICTIMS

Military kills 4 kidnappers, rescues 3 victims — 30th June 2016 Arrests 11 fake Naval personnel From Tony John, Port Harcourt TROOPS of 2 Brigade, Nigerian Army, Port Harcourt, yesterday killed four suspected kidnappers and rescued three victims in Iba/Obele, Emohua Local Government Area of Rivers State. The victims were abducted on Monday in Rumuji, Emuoha LGA, while travelling along the East-West Road. They were taken to the kid­nappers’ camp in Iba/Obele. Confirming the report, the As­sistant Director, Public Relations Officer, 2 Brigade, Port Harcourt, Captain Eli Lazarus, said soldiers acted on information, closed in on the criminals and engaged them in a shoot-out to rescue the three vic­tims. He said the three men were res­cued unhurt, while four suspected kidnappers were killed during the operation, adding that the opera­tion was ongoing to clear kidnap­pers and cultists’ camps in the state. The Brigade assured members of the public that security agencies would not rest on their oars in at­tacking criminals and urged the residents to continue to volunteer information that would assist secu­rity agencies. Also, the Nigerian Navy Ship, NNS Pathfinder, Port Harcourt, has arrested 11 men for allegedly parading themselves as Naval per­sonnel. The out-going Commander, Port Harcourt, Commodore Sanusi Ibra­him, disclosed this yesterday, while handing over the suspects to the po­lice command.

FORGERY! SARAKI, EKWEREMADU,SGF IN WAR

Forgery: Saraki, Ekweremadu, SGF in verbal war — 30th June 2016 From Juliana Taiwo-Obalonye and Fred Itua, Abuja THE Secretary to the Government of the Federation (SGF), Babachir Lawal, yesterday decried the attempt by the Senate President, Bukola Saraki and his deputy, Ike Ekweremadu, to pass off their forgery trial as an attack on the legislature or the National Assembly. He told the two principal officers that they were the ones on trial and cautioned them to stop giving the erroneous impression to Nigerians that the National Assembly was on trial. He also told them to allow the court adjudicate on the matter. Lawal, in a statement he personally signed, declared that a case of forgery is usu­ally preferred against individuals, recalling that such a case of forgery led to the resigna­tion of the former Speaker of the House of Representatives, Salisu Buhari. But the Senate spokesman, Abdul­lahi Sabi, disagreed as he insisted that the primary target of the forgery suit was the entire Senate. Sabi maintained in a statement that the trial was an attempt to intimidate the legislature and force a leadership change in the Senate. Saraki, Ekweremadu, Salisu Abubakar Maikasuwa and Benedict Efeturi were on Monday arraigned before the Federal High Court, Abuja, on charges of forging the Senate Standing Rules with which they conducted the election that brought them into office as principal officers. While insisting that the forgery case against Saraki, Ekweremadu and other was done by a group of senators and not the executive, the SGF frowned at the uncom­plimentary remarks being made against President Muhammadu Buhari, insisting that case against them is not a personal vendetta as being presented by both Saraki and Ekweremadu. The statement said: “Since the arraignment of the President of the Senate, Senator Bukola Saraki and, his Deputy Senator Ike Ekweremadu before the Federal High Court on Monday, June 27, 2016, the two leaders of the Senate, have issued two separate press statements conveying messages that are far from being complementary to the person and govern­ment of President Muhammadu Buhari. Saraki in his statement clearly insinuated that Mr. President is not in control of his administration and that a cabal now runs the federal administration. On the part of Ekweremadu, he insists that Buhari is exhibiting dictatorial tendencies that can derail our democracy. “From their statements, the two lead­ers of the Senate also gave this erroneous impression that by their arraignment, it is the entire Senate and indeed, the Legislative Arm of Government that is on trial. They want the public to believe that their pros­ecution is utter disregard by the Executive Arm of government for the constitutional provisions of separation of powers and that preferring the forgery case against them is a vendetta exercise. “Since this case is in court, the Judiciary should be allowed to do its job. However, it is important to emphasize that this case involves only the four accused persons and should not be presented to the unsuspecting public as involving the entire Senate of the Federal Republic of Nigeria. “The complaint leading to the forgery investigation was reported to the Police by some aggrieved Senators who specifi­cally accused certain persons. It is not the Senate of the Federal Republic of Nigeria that is involved and definitely not the House of Representatives. To bring the National Assembly as a body into this court case is totally unwarranted. It can only be for other purposes and reasons outside the investiga­tion and legal proceedings. “A case of forgery is usually preferred against individuals. This is not different. As was the case with a former Speaker of the House of Representatives, who was accused of certificate forgery, what he did was to resign, honourably. The matter did not even go to court. In that particular case, it was never orchestrated as a matter for the National Assembly. The individual involved did not drag the entire Legislature into the matter. “Meanwhile the separate statements by the Senate President and his Deputy are indeed contradictory. While Senator Saraki believes Mr. President has abdicated his powers and that a cabal is in charge of Fed­eral Administration, Senator Ekweremadu says President Buhari has become a dictator. “Our democracy is still evolving and being deepened. The provisions of the separation of powers are entrenched in our Constitu­tion and should guide everyone in our conduct. The rule of law is indeed supreme. This particular case is before the judiciary and is not being decided by the Executive Arm of Government. All that has transpired is still within the confines of our laws. These are the rights to accuse, to be investigated and be arraigned before the court. To impute other considerations to the process is unfortunate. We should allow the process to take its course, in consonance with the dictates of the law and total obeisance to the cardinal democratic principle of the separa­tion of powers.” Senate reacts “Mr. Babachir Lawal should tell us how reasonable it is to conclude that when the President of Nigeria and the Vice Presi­dent are being jointly tried in a suit whose outcome can remove them from office, it is not the Buhari government that is being targeted. “It is also imperative to clearly state that contrary to the claim by the SGF, neither the Senate President, nor Ekweremadu were mentioned by the petitioners, the statements by those interviewed by the police or even the police report. “Meanwhile, let us refreshen Mr. Lawal’s memory about the facts of the 1999 case. It is obvious that the Senate President and his deputy are not being accused of certificate forgery as it happened in ex-Speaker Salisu Buhari’s case. “Therefore, nobody should compare an apple with orange. Also, neither Saraki nor Ekweremadu is below the age requirement for their present position as it was alleged in the Buhari case. Attempts to make the two situations look similar is to present all Nigerians as having no sense of history. “We also know that nobody can be ac­cused of forging his own signature. The executive is in no position to determine what is the correct Standing Orders of the Senate. The Senate President and his deputy were as at the morning of the June 9, 2015 inauguration of the Senate mere senators-elect and could therefore not have been in a position to influence any alteration in the rule book. “The Senate as an institution, and indeed the National Assembly, has spoken about their understanding of the present assault on their independence by the executive’. We maintain that this trial is a design by the Executive to criminalise the internal affairs of the Senate to create a distraction for the leadership of the Senate, force a leadership change and cow the legislators. “Those behind this plot find this trial more expedient and important than finding tangible solutions to the multi-various socio-economic problems bedeviling the country. However, we are sure they will fail in this attempt. We only hope they will allow the judiciary to truly and creditably perform its duties and give independent verdict on the case.”

Saturday, June 25, 2016

IPOB REPLIES BUHARI :SAY BREXIT IS MORALE BOOSTER FOR BIAFRA

·  IPOB replies Buhari ·  Says BREXIT is morale booster for Biafra   The Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), yes­terday dismissed as baseless, the statement by President Muhammadu Bu­hari that most of those agi­tating for a free independent state of Biafra did not “see” or experience the Nigeria/Biafra civil war of 1967-1970. A statement signed by the Public Relations Officer of the Supreme Council of El­ders of Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), Eze Iheanyi Nwokenna, declared that all the elders of Pro-Biafra ex­perienced the war and par­ticipated in it. It therefore described as unfortunate and insult­ing the statement credited to Buhari recently that the current pro-Biafra agitators did not witness the Nigeria/Biafra war. Parts of the statement read; “It appears that the Nigerian President has will­fully hidden the truth of the Biafra struggle for self-de­termination from the gen­eral public. ‘’We want to bring it to the notice of the whole world that by the Legal Instrument dated 12 Sept 2012 served with the Originating Sum­mons from the Federal High Court Owerri on the Federal Government of Nigeria and Attorney-General of the Federation as Defendants, the Supreme Council of El­ders of Indigenous People of Biafra headed by His Royal Majesty & His Lord­ship, the Honourable Jus­tice Eze Ozobu OFR (rtd) as Chairman, Dr Dozie Ikedife (Ikenga Nnewi) as Deputy Chairman, Brig. Gen Joe Achuzia (rtd) as the Secretary and other members of the Council, notified the Government of the Federal Republic of Nigeria that the remnants of Biafra who were not con­sumed in the war had de­cided to exercise their right to self-determination by the rule of law in the name of Indigenous People of Bi­afra (IPOB) suing in a rep­resentative capacity by the human rights organization called Bilie Human Rights Initiative. “Upon the commence­ment of the suit between Biafra and Nigeria in 2012 as Suit No FHC/OW/CS/102/2012 which was later renumbered as Suit No FHC/OW/CS/192/2013, the body known as Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB) came to the notice of the Nigerian Gov­ernment and received judi­cial recognition. “The Federal Government of Nigeria hired its own law­yers and joined issues with us and both parties have been in the legal battle for more than three years. “Contrary to the assertion of Mr. President, we make bold to state that all the El­ders of Indigenous People of Biafra who authorized the Biafran struggle for self-determination by the Rule of Law in 2012, saw the war. “In fact, most of the Elders fought in the war and were senior to President Buhari in military career. We the El­ders of Biafraland are solidly behind the Biafra struggle for self-determination by le­gal and diplomatic method. We have emphasized several times in our publications that the Biafra struggle for self-determination must fol­low the due process of law. “We have made it clear that we are Biafrans by indigenous identity but Nigerians by citizenship which was forced upon us against our will. “This is why we are in Court and in the United Na­tions and have been admitted into the Consultative Status of the United Nations ECOSOC through our Legal Represen­tative. We do not accept the use of violence, insults, abus­es, hate speeches, incitement to anarchy, disrespect to con­stituted authorities, and other vices, as a method of struggle for self-determination. “The next adjourned date for the hearing of the case be­tween Biafra and Nigeria is 22 September 2016. “President Muhammadu Buhari and the Nigerian leaders are aware of the next hearing date and have in­structed their lawyers. “We want to make it clear that we commenced the suit between Biafra and Nigeria in 2012 during the admin­istration of President Good­luck Jonathan. “This fact therefore de­stroys the argument of the critics who have accused us of commencing the Biafran struggle for self-determina­tion because Dr Goodluck Jonathan lost the election in 2015 to President Buhari. “Even if an Igbo man of the One-Nigeria-Syndrome becomes a President of Ni­geria, we the Biafrans shall still leave Nigeria. After all, Mr Gordon Brown of Scot­land was the Prime Minister of Britain but the Scottish people still want to go. ‘’We are aware that Presi­dent Buhari and the Nige­rian Leaders are doing ev­erything possible to hide the genuine Biafran struggle for self-determination by the rule of law from the eyes of the public. “Most of the media houses in Nigeria have willfully kept the truth away from the reading public while promoting the agents of lawlessness and anarchy. “It is clear to us that the Nigerian Government has continued to promote the rebellious kids parading themselves as “Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB)” who abuse the Elders of the land to discredit the Biafran struggle and make it look childish. ‘’For not disclosing to the public that the matter between Biafra and Nigeria is in court, the Defendants are helping the rebellious kids to attract more con­verts who do not know that there is a legal option. This is why the children are on the streets. “They were not told that the matter is in court as the Nigerian media and the Radio Biafra, London have done everything possible to hide the self-determination case from the public. Ev­erybody knows that when a matter is in court, nobody fights or makes noise about it until the court decides the case. “The best thing the Fed­eral Government of Nige­ria will do now is to inform the general public that the matter between Biafra and Nigeria is in court and will soon be resolved. Also, the Federal Government should not cause a delay in the hearing of the case.” “In his statement, Mr. President reminded us of the Biafrans who lost their lives during the war. He failed to tell the world that the Federal Government of Nigeria violated the laws of war and used starvation as a weapon of war to kill the children and the civilian population of Biafra in order to win the war. “What was the intention of Mr. President in reminding us of the wounds inflicted on us by the Defendants in the ongoing case? We advise Mr. President to stop making provocative statements that infuriate our children. “On the issue of self-deter­mination, we are not going back. Both the Nigerian Law and International Law are on our side. Certainly, Biafra must be free. It is only a mat­ter of time!” Meanwhile, The Indig­enous Peoples of Biafra (IPOB), has congratulated the people of Britain over their choice to exit from the European Union (EU) in last Thursday’s referendum tagged BREXIT. IPOB spokespersons, Emma Nmezu and Clifford Iroanya, in a press statement yesterday also applauded the British Government for respecting the wishes of the people by organising the ref­erendum. The pro-Biafra group, therefore, urged the British Government which it de­scribed as “the closest ally” of the Nigerian Government to “as a mark of exemplary leadership, guide President Muhammadu Buhari to or­ganise a BIAFREXIT akin to BREXIT.” IPOB accused Britain of hypocrisy for giving Britons the opportunity to decide whether or not they wished to belong to EU on the one hand, while on the other hand strongly opposes the agitation for self rule by Bi­afrans. According to the state­ment, “it smacks of hypoc­risy that the same David Cameron that initiated the BREXIT vote has been propping up Buhari‘s gov­ernment in the murderous acts of suppressing the quest by Biafrans to exit from Ni­geria. “This leaves Biafrans to ask if David Cameron’s hypoc­risy is because Biafrans are blacks and if black Africans are 

EKITI STATE WORKER'S SUSPEND STRIKE, SIGN AGREEMENT WITH FAYOSE

Ekiti workers suspend strike, sign agreement with Fayose — 25th June 2016 BY WOLE BALOGUN, ADO EKITI WORKERS in Ekiti State yesterday suspended their four-week-old industrial strike, following the signing of an agreement with the state government. At a ceremony in Ado-Ekiti, the state gov­ernment and the central labour unions agreed to a sev­en-point deal. On government side, were the Secretary to the Govern­ment, Dr. Mrs Modupe Alade; the Head of Service, Dr. Gben­ga Faseluka and the Chief of Staff, Chief Dipo Anisulowo. On the side of labour, were the Chairman, Joint Negotiating Council, Comrade Ola­dipo Johnson; the state Chairman of the Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC), Comrade Ade Adesanmi and state Chairman of the Trade Union Congress (TUC), Comrade Odun­ayo Adesoye. Among the resolutions reached were that the state government should within seven days conclude its request with commercial banks to restructure person­al loans granted pub­lic servants with a view to giving them relief from loan repayment; payment of January 2016 salary immedi­ately and the payment of Feb­ruary salary as soon as Budget Support Fund is available. Others were giving priority to government’s obligations to public servants, payment of September 2014 salary of primary school teachers as well as Leave Bonus of local government employees. Others were making N10 million available monthly to gradually defray outstanding gratuities, release the report of the 2015 staff verification exercise and making month­ly provision for capacity building of public servants. Speaking on the develop­ment, the Head of Service, expressed appreciation for the understanding shown by the labour leaders and the com­mitment of Governor Ayodele Fayose to ensure industrial harmony in the state. He said the gap in the payment of salaries arose following the understanding between labour and govern­ment last September that the state’s resources and statutory allocations were no longer adequate to pay salaries and there was need to merge two allocations to pay a month’s salary. “When you have such a sit­uation, it is obvious that when you get to 12 months, there would be a gap of six months. The arrangement started and we were combining two allo­cations to pay a month salary. The state government appre­ciates the workers and value their support and coopera­tion,” he said. The JNC Chairman, Comrade Oladipo John­son, said the suspension of the strike would allow further consultations and expressed thanks to workers for their support during the strike.

BREXIT :BUHARI NOT HAPPY ABOUT DAVID CAMERON RESIGNATION

BREXIT: Buhari regrets Cameron’s resignation — 25th June 2016 FROM JULIANA TAIWO-OBALONYE, ABUJA PRESIDENT Muhammadu Buhari has regret­ted the resignation of British Prime Minister, David Cameron, which will come into effect in October. He described the Prime Minister as a coura­geous leader and a statesman, who respects the will of the people. The Senior Special Assistant on Media and Publicity, Garba Shehu, in a statement quoted the President as saying, Nigeria enjoyed remark­able goodwill, support and understanding under Cameron’s administration over the years. Buhari said Cameron’s resignation in response to the outcome of a referendum that supported Britain to leave the European Union “was a dem­onstration of courage by a democratic leader who respects the will of the people, even if he didn’t agree with their decision.” He noted that by, “putting the will of the peo­ple before his political future, the prime minister proved himself to be a selfless leader with re­spect for democracy and voters› sovereignty.» He expressed hope that Nigeria looks forward to greater cooperation and consolidation of shared interests with Britain, despite the outcome of the referendum.

EU REFERENDUM: DAVID CAMERON GUITS AS UK SHOCKS THE WORLD

 EU referendum: Cameron quits as UK shocks the world — 25th June 2016 Scotland, Northern Ireland kickIt’ll have negative effects on Nigeria – Experts  By EMMA EMEOZOR and VINCENT KALU  THE United Kingdom Thursday withdrew from the European Union in a referendum vote that shocked the international com­munity and forced the British Prime Minister David Cameron to resign. The referendum held after four years of bitter campaign with the country divided be­tween two groups who remained antagonistic towards each other even till now: the Remain camp and the Leave camp (referred to as Brexit). The result showed that the Remain camp had 16,141,241 (48.1 %) votes while the Leave camp won 17,410,742 (51.9 %) votes. It was the second time a referendum has been held to determine the EU status in UK, the first being 1975, when continued membership was ap­proved by 67 per cent of voters. The Remain camp lost despite the strong backing of Scotland, Northern Ireland and London. The process leading to UK’s exit was set in motion after the legal basis for a referendum was established by the Parliament in accordance with the ruling party’s manifesto commitment “through the European Union Referendum Act 2015.” UK becomes the first country to quit the Union since its for­mation, though the Leave vote does not mean it ceases to be a member of the 28-nation body. Due process leading to a final exit would have to be followed . The process could take a min­imum of two years. Conscious of the implications of an exit, the Leave camp had, during the campaign, suggested the pro­cess should not be completed until 2020, the date of the coun­try’s next general election. While the Remain camp con­siders the outcome of the refer­endum most disappointing and a chattered dream for a nation it felt stronger in the Union, the Leave camp believes it is good riddance to a bad omen. Cameron, first victim The outcome of the refer­endum is a double tragedy for Prime Minister David Cameron who was full of hope that the Remain camp would gain vic­tory. Just as UK is quitting the Union, he is also quitting the of­fice of the prime minister. In an emotional speech, with breaks in his voice, Cameron yesterday announced he would step down in October for “fresh leadership.” “The British people have voted to leave the Europe­an Union and their will must be respected. The will of the Brit­ish people is an instruction that must be delivered,” he added. He explained he had informed Queen Elizabeth II of his deci­sion to remain in office for the short term and that it would be for the new prime minister to carry out negotiations with EU. Boris Johnson booed by angry crowd Reports said an angry crowd booed Brexit leader and likely successor of Cameron ashe left his north London home. The Leave campaign had argued during the campaign that the only way Britain could “take back control” of its own affairs would be to leave the EU. Leave dismissed warnings from economists and international bod­ies about the economic impact of Brexit as “scaremongering” by a self-serving elite. UK media reported that many businesses would be concerned about the ref­erendum result. “The urgent pri­ority now is to reassure the mar­kets”, but warned against “rushed decisions,” the reports quoted fi­nancial experts as saying. Scotland, Northern Ireland kick Scotland First Minister Nic­ola Sturgeon in a swift reaction warned that a second indepen­dence referendum was “highly likely.” She noted that there was now a significant divergence be­tween Scotland and the rest of Britain, which she “deeply regret­ted”. “It was democratically unac­ceptable that Scotland faced the prospect of being taken out of the EU against its will,” she said. She said the Scottish government would begin preparing legislation to enable another independence vote. Scotland voted in favour of the UK staying in the EU by 62% to 38%. The SNP manifesto for May’s Holyrood elections said the Scot­tish Parliament should have the right to hold another referendum if there was a “significant and material change” in the circum­stances that prevailed at the time of the 2014 referendum, such as Scotland being taken out of the EU against its will. Northern Ireland has also threatened to seek independence following the Brexit win. EU reacts The EU’s reaction after the re­sult was released was expected. On the eve of the referendum, the President of the European Council, Jean-Claude Juncker, had warned that there would be no more negotiations if the Leave camp wins. “Out is out,” he said. The Union’s leadership compris­ing of President of the European Parliament, Donald Tusk, Presi­dent of the European Parliament Martin Schulz and President of the European Council, Mark Rutte met yesterday with Juncker in Brussels, the Unions headquarters and asked UK to invoke In a state­ment, they said: Any delay would be unnecessarily prolong uncer­tainty. We have rules to deal with this in an orderly way. Article 50 of the Treaty on European Union sets out the procedure to be fol­lowed if a Member State decides to leave the European Union. “We stand ready to launch negotiations swiftly with the United Kingdom regarding the terms and conditions of its withdrawal from the European Union.” EU foreign ministers to meet today The foreign ministers of the founding six-member states: France, Germany, the Nether­lands, Luxembourg, Italy and Belgium will meet today to dis­cuss the implications of the UK quit. According to reports, on the agenda is also a discussion of the migration crisis, includ­ing the issue of deportation of migrants back to Africa and the current deployment of na­val craft off Libya to intercept smugglers. This is because UK has a major role on the matter. Already a UK warship has been deployed in the EU’s naval op­eration and a second has been promised. Article 50 – and a new deal Triggering Article 50, for­mally notifying the intension to withdraw, starts a two-year clock running. After that, the Treaties that govern member­ship no longer apply to Britain. The terms of exit will be negoti­ated between Britain’s 27 coun­terparts, and each will have a veto over the conditions. It will also be subject to ratification in national parliaments, meaning, for example, that Belgian MPs could stymie the entire process. Two vast negotiating teams will be created, far larger than those seen in the British renego­tiation. The EU side is likely to be headed by one of the current Commissioners. Untying Britain from the old membership is the easy bit. Harder would be agreeing a new trading relationship, establish­ing what tariffs and other bar­riers to entry are permitted, and agreeing on obligations such as free movement. Such a process, EU leaders claim, could take another five years. Business leaders want the easiest terms possible, to pre­vent economic harm. But po­litical leaders say the conditions will be brutal to discourage other states from following suit World leaders react German Chancellor Angela Merkel expressed “great regret” at the British decision, saying: “This is a blow to Europe and to the European unification pro­cess” Mrs Merkel said she would meet Mr Tusk,French President Francois Hollande andItalian PM Matteo Renzi in Berlin on Monday Mr Hollande said the vote “se­riously puts Europe to the test”, adding: “I respect this painful choice. France will continue to work with this friendly country” Russian President Vladimir Putin said the decision showed the UK’s unhappiness with mi­gration and security Estonian Prime Minister Taa­vi Roivas said: “We must… work hard so that we do not lose the unity of the European Union” Portuguese President Marcelo Rebelo de Sousa said, “the Eu­ropean project remains valid to defend the values that mark our common identity” Czech PM Bohuslav Sobotka said: “Despite the disappoint­ment many of us feel… we must realise that this is not the end of the world and it’s absolutely not the end of the EU.” He also echoed the voices of many in calling for change, saying: “Eu­rope must be more operational, flexible, less bureaucratic and much more perceptive to the diversity that its member states represent” Greek PM Alexis Tsipras said the vote was “either a wake-up call or the beginning of a danger­ous path”, adding: “We urgently need a new vision and beginning for a united Europe for a better Europe, more social and demo­cratic” Implications of Britain exiting the EU-Nigerian experts Britain’s decision to leave the European Union (EU) will have negative consequences on Nige­ria, Prof. Bola Akinterinwa, Di­rector-General, Nigerian Institute of International Affairs (NIIA), has said. Akinterinwa, a professor of in­ternational affairs, on Friday siad that the negative impact of Brit­ain’s exit from the union would be bilaterally and multilaterally. According to him, it is at the level of multilateral configuration that Nigeria may be slightly affected. “Britain is a member of the EU and Nigeria is a member of Com­monwealth and in this case, Brit­ain is both an active member of the EU and Commonwealth. Ni­geria has been benefitting from the free trade tariff access of the British to the EU; now with the Brexit (Britain Exit), that one (free trade tariff access) may be­come a little bit difficult for Ni­geria,” he said. Akinterinwa said that Nige­ria’s economic relationship with the EU might also be affected with the development, explain­ing that it would jeopardise Eco­nomic Partnership Agreement (EPA) with the EU. “With the withdrawal of the British from the EU, now the EPA will no longer apply to Ni­geria within the framework of Nigeria’s bilateral relationship with the British,” he said. Politically, he stated that a weakened Europe would also af­fect Nigeria in terms of aid dona­tion to the country. “Politically, Brexit can bring about a weakened economy of Europe; it will be weakened in various respects because Britain accounts for about 15 per cent of EU’s operational budget. This will create more burdens for countries like France and Ger­many, the two main countries carrying the financial burden of other member-states. “With that relationship with the European Union, the other members will also be weakened. When it comes to insolvency, the amount of money given to Nige­ria either as development grant or whatsoever, cannot but be re­duced. So, these are some of the implications,” he said. Akinterinwa added that Brexit could also affect Nigeria’s and ECOWAS’ relationship with the EU. According to him, since Britain is not part of the Schen­gen Visa Regime, anyone going to Britain must apply for visa di­rectly for Britain. Two other Nigerian political scientists however shared dif­fered from Akinterinwa’s views. Prof Ebere Onwudiwe, political scientist, and Executive Direc­tor of Ken Nnamani Centre for Leadership and Development, Abuja said “The costs may in­clude the break-up of the United Kingdom (Scotland may have new referendum ideas) or even the disintegration of the EU itself since other member countries may follow UK’s bad example. One cannot say that Mr. Cam­eron was not aware of these per­ils. But a promise is a promise in the mind of a great principled leader. This is what African lead­ers should take from this referen­dum in Great Britain, principled leadership.” He added that “There may be impacts on developmental aid from the EU, where UK is a great contributor as a former colonizer of large portions of the continent that has resulted in the current Commonwealth Africa. It is too early to say what the exit of UK from EU will mean for the preferential trading schemes that UK’s presence in the EU pro­vided for Commonwealth Africa, and for the trade benefits provid­ed in the Cotonou Agreement of 2000 between the EU and Africa. Anyone can speculate on what direction all these and many oth­er potential impacts will take, but no one actually knows for sure because this is totally new and unfamiliar.” For Dr. Sylvester Odion Akhaine, lecturer, Department of political science, Lagos State University, Ojo, the development is good for Africa. According to him “for us in Africa, the global hegemons when they are in dis­array, it is good for our own au­tonomous development. “If you look at how they have made their game, Britain is not out of NATO alliance, which is a military bloc, and they all en­forced that the leading member of the bloc in terms of pro-action is France, Britain and of course, the United States of America. They still have that military might to influence their policies and decisions within the conti­nent. You can’t take that away from them. “There is a way we are wit­nessing the decline of Britain. Not too long ago, they went into a referendum with Scot­land. Scotland though in, it is not over, there will still be a referen­dum. Don’t forget there is still a separatist agitation in Wales. Scotland, apart from being under United Kingdom has every other thing to themselves, they have the Scottish pound. When they go for global competitions they go as Scotland. You can see the kind of power distribution with­in Britain, even though it is not a federal, but unitary state, but there is power distribution within the Island.

GUNMEN INVADE LAGOS, OGUN COMMUNITIES.....KILL OVER 25

MILITANTS INVADE LAGOS, OGUN COMMUNITIES… KILL OVER 3O — 25th June 2016 We won’t take this anymore – Afenifere By YINKA OLUDAYISI FABOWALE, TUNDE THOMAS and CHRISTOPHER ORJI BARELY a week after gunmen sus­pected to be Niger Delta militants and oil vandals invaded Imushin, a sleepy community in Ogun State, killing about 15 villagers, two other border communities between Lagos and Ogun states; Elepete and Igbo Olomu in Ogijo area of Ikorodu were again attacked by armed men. By the time the smok­ing guns of the attackers ceased fir­ing, about 30 persons were feared killed and scores injured. The attack took place on Thursday night/ early hours of Friday. In the latest attack at Elepete and Igbo Olomu, it was learnt that sev­eral of the victims were landlords who had formed a vigilance group due to incessant armed robbery at­tacks in their areas, made bonfires at strategic points and were on pa­trol when the militants swooped on them. The militants, who were said to be returning around 11pm from the creeks where they had allegedly gone to perpetrate their illegal busi­ness, opened fire as they arrived at Elepete after they mistook the vigi­lance group, for law enforcement agents. As the victims fled, the militants chased them and rained bullets on the defenceless villagers. By day­break on Friday, no fewer than 30 dead bodies were reportedly re­covered from various points, while most of the residents had fled the communities for safety. Dead bodies everywhere as residents flee Another source in one of the communities said the militants had accused the villagers of giving in­formation to security operatives about their illegal activities. The hoodlums were said to be angry at the way joint security operatives took over the area, preventing them from carrying out their criminal acts. A community leader, John Ogunike said “Some of our rela­tives were slaughtered like ram. Mr Isioluwa Angus and his wife Rose­mary were slaughtered with knife. Some of the victims were shot at close range while some were hit by stray bullet. “At the Lagos State side, five Police patrol vans were used to evacuate 20 dead bodies. In Ogun side ,we don’t know how many people lost their lives, but, informa­tion reaching me showed that many dead bodies have been discovered .Ogun State people are yet to evacu­ate the bodies on their own side. “We are relocating from this community. Everybody is scared. Even the neighbouring communi­ties are also running away because, no one knows his fate. It happened last week at Ibeshi, Imushin and no one suspected they would storm our area. Who knows the next place they will go tomorrow as they have vowed to wipe out communities within this axis. We are begging the government to come to our rescue” As at the time of filling this re­port, people were still fleeing the communities. Soldiers and Policemen have, however, been drafted to the area. Lagos State Commissioner of Po­lice, Mr Fatai Owoseni, and his deputies were also in the area for on the spot assessment. Disputing the casualty figure, Owosenis Ogun State counterpart, said only two persons were con­firmed dead. The Public Relations Officer of the state command, Olu­muyiwa Adejobi, said only two per­sons were killed by suspected mili­tants who have been laying siege on the communities. He said:“Two people have been confirmed dead. The militants came again and attacked the community. We will only continue to work col­lectively with all relevant agencies to stop the attacks. They came yes­terday (Thursday) and attacked and went back to the creeks.” Militants’ spread of terror Penultimate Friday night of June 17, 2016 was a black night in Imushin community, Ogijo area of Ogun State. It was a night about 100 gunmen suspected to be Niger Delta militants invaded the com­munity on the boundary between Lagos and Ogun states, in a shoot­ing spree that left 15 of the residents cold dead. Among the 15 killed in the attack was a technician, Waheed Buhari, aka Yah Alau, said to have been shot dead in front of his room, with one of his children, Mariam, sus­taining bullet wounds. Also included was a travel agent, Mr. Oladele Ogundare, who had just returned home in his car, when the rampaging militants opened fire on his car and killed him. Another victim, Umoru, who was said to be eating noodles, was chased, hacked and shot to death, along with a friend, Danladi.and a Muslim cleric killed when the mosque in the community, was at­tacked. Two hotels were reportedly raid­ed and their customers robbed and injured, while more than 25 shops in the community were looted by the rampaging beseigers. As families of the slain victims thronged graves to bury their rela­tions according to Islamic rites last weekend, there were no doubts as to the criminal motives and na­ture of the siege. Although many of the residents, said the militants were suspected to be Ijaw youths involved in pipeline vandalism, es­pecially in the creeks and riverine areas, who were probably on a re­venge mission for the killing of two of the vandals earlier on Friday by some operatives of the State Anti- Robbery Squad, it was another orgy in the increasing bloody raids and assault on Yorubaland by the ex-militants, who seemed to have shifted shop from the South South and the South East to the South West enclave in their daring crimi­nal ventures and exploits. At least that appears to be the reading of the South West leaders of the latest and series of violent crimes perceived to have been committed by the militants, especially after se­curity intelligence linked some Ijaw militancy and criminal syndicates’ kingpins to high profile robberies and kidnappings that made waves in the last one year. Ahead of a peace meeting be­tween leaders of the Ijaw nation, who are at pains distancing their people from the heinous acts, and Afenifere, the pan Yoruba socio cultural organization, the latter, has sounded a note of warning that it would not tolerate further any de­spoliation of its people from any quarter. There have been growing strong indications that Niger Delta ex-mil­itants as well as militiamen made jobless as a result of demobilization and reported cut in the budget of the Niger Delta Presidential Amnesty office in the last one year have in­vaded the South West, especially, Lagos, Ogun and Ondo States and are responsible for the various re­cent acts of kidnappings, robberies and other criminal activities in the region. Former President Goodluck Jon­athan’s administration had awarded contracts to six companies to guard pipelines belonging to the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation. The pipeline security and surveil­lance contract, said to have been worth N9.3bn, was carried out between March 15 and June 15, 2015. The contract was awarded to companies owned by former Niger Delta militants, self-determination groups and prominent Nigerians including Government Tompolo Ekpumopolo, Mujaheedin Asari- Dokubo, Ateke Toms, Bipobiri Ajube and Ebikabowei Victor Ben (Boyloaf). Others are the company of the founder of Oodua Peoples Con­gress, Chief Fredrick Fasehun and OPC national co-ordinator, Gani Adams The operational areas for the companies were: Egbe Security River One (Bayelsa), Gallery Se­curity (Mosinmi-Ore), Close Body Protection (Edo), Adex Energy Security (Rivers), Donyx Global Concept (Lagos and Ogun), Oil Facilities Surveillance (Delta) and New Age Global Security (Mosin­mi-Ibadan). Impeccable security sources said available intelligence suggested that some of the ex-militants, whose source of livelihood was lost af­ter President Muhammadu Buhari cancelled the pipeline protection contracts, were responsible for the recent upsurge of crime particularly in Lagos State. A senior DSS official confessed that the police and other security agencies were finding it difficult to control the proliferation of fire­arms in the possession of the ex-militants. It was learnt that some of the ex-militants and militia­men responsible for protecting the pipelines during former Goodluck Jonathan’s administration, in ad­dition to returning to pipeline van­dalism and illegal oil bunkering in the coastal areas of the South West, notably Arepo, Ikorodu, Ilaje and Ogun waterside also turned to kidnapping and robberies to make money. “Since abduction seems to be profitable and less risky, job­less ex-militants and militia group members seem to have found a lu­crative business in the kidnapping of hapless citizens,” a security chief said in an interview. Since President Buhari did not renew the contracts awards. the states in the South West have wit­nessed robbery attacks and upsurge in violent crimes between last year and now. The heightened situation, observ­ers note, can be explained by the heat of deployment of troops to cur­tail resurgent militancy in the Ni­ger Delta region, which may have forced more of the hoodlums out to seek safer haven in the West. There have also been several cases of robberies and kidnapping, including the abduction of wife of the Deputy Managing Director/ Deputy Editor-in Chief of the Sun Publlishing Limited, Steve Nwosu, two photojournalists of The Sun and The Nation newspapers and others in Festac area of Amuwo Odofin Local Government area, with the abductors said to have of­ten made their escape in speedboats and through waterways and canals, lending to the suspicion that they were militants. The latest was the abduction of three schoolgirls from the Babington Macaulay Junior Seminary, Ikorodu, A gang of robbers on Wednesday, June 24, 2015, attacked two new generation banks in the Ikorodu area of the state. The robbers were said to have trailed a bullion van to the premises of one bank in the Ogolonto area of the town before moving to another bank after they were done with the first. The police reportedly engaged the militants in a gun duel. The sites of the militants’ latest strike -Elepete and Igbo Olomu are not too far from Imushin. In the latest attack, at Elepete and Igbo Olomu, a source within one of the communities, who spoke on the condition of anon­imity, said several of the victims were landlords. However, the police said only two persons were confirmed dead. The Public Relations Officer, Ogun State Police Command, Olumuyiwa Adejobi, said only two people were killed by suspect­ed militants who have been laying siege on the communities. He said, “Two people have been confirmed dead. The militants came again and attack the com­munity. We will only continue to work collectively with all relevant agencies to stop the attacks. They came yesterday (Thursday) and attacked and went back to the creeks.” Adejobi added that the police would fish out the criminals. Before now, no fewer than 40 armed robbers invaded two com­mercial banks in Festac Town, La­gos, on October 13, 2015, report­edly carting away a huge sum of money, while about 20 armed rob­bers, wearing military camouflage also attacked five banks in Agbara Industrial Estate in Ogun State in November last year. Also, detectives attached to Igando Police Station on Iba Road, Lagos State, recently arrest­ed two men who, they alleged, had just arrived from Niger Delta via the waterway to carry out a bank robbery. The suspects, identified as Chinedu Okoro and Keme Pat­rick, were said to have been plan­ning the robbery for Friday of that week. A gang also reportedly serial robbed some commercial banks including two branches of Ze­nith and First Bank last year in Ikorodu area. In the raid, the rob­bers were said to have arrived Ipa­kodo around 8.30am, announcing their arrival with sporadic gunfire and use of dynamite to scare resi­dents, road users and bank work­ers, while they operated unhin­dered till about 10: 05am. They came with a dove, mortar and charms, even as the gang leader, a woman reportedly suspended a live tortoise round her neck and tied a snake round her waist. Eye witnesses said the robbers, who wielded sophisticated weapons, drove to the scene in three SUVs but later escaped in a boat through a jetty christened Origin Gardens, which operates Ipakodo enroute Victoria Island. The robbers allegedly made away with about N20 million that was to be loaded into the Auto­mated Teller Machines (ATM) at a Zenith Bank branch in Ebute- Ipakodo in Ikorodu, Lagos. Satisfied with their booty, the gunmen stormed out and chal­lenged the policemen, whose station was opposite the First Bank branch. But no policeman was in sight. Four persons, including a teenage apprentice vulcaniser, simply identi­fied as Rilwan, were injured by the robbers during the attacks said to be similar to that of March 12 last year robbery in Lekki, Lagos. It was learnt that the bandits, numbering about 16 invaded the banks located directly opposite the Ipakodo Police Divi­sion, at about 9am and started shoot­ing indiscriminately. A bank official said the robbers carted away over N80million from Zenith Bank which “a bullion van was to transport out of the bank.” A resident of the area, Chinedu Chapel said the police were helpless, adding that it was a pointer that Nige­rian citizens were not secured. Another eyewitness, Ademola Fashola, said he hid somewhere around the jetty area while the rob­bers escaped. Also on Saturday, March 14, 2015, deadly armed robbers unleashed terror on Lekki Peninsular Scheme 1, Victoria Island area, attacking a branch of First City Monument Bank, FCMB, on Admiralty Way, leaving three policemen and a teen­age fish hawker dead. About 10 in number and dressed in army uniform, they attacked, shoot­ing sporadically for almost an hour. The dead policemen were said to been unlucky, being on routine patrol when they were sighted by the rob­bers who immediately opened fire on them. “It was like we were in a war front,” an eye witness recalled. Some militants also abducted a se­nior Naval officer and two others in Lagos in June last year and demand­ed a N7 million ransom. What has strengthened the theory of the perceived active if not sole in­volvement of Niger Delta militants in these criminal activities was the arrest of the leader of the notorious robbers raiding commercial banks in Lagos and Ogun States and terroris­ing residents, sometime ago. Identified as Kelly Foto, a.k.a, Kel­vin, he was nabbed along with three of his gang members. The gang boss, is alleged to be also the notorious Kel­vin of Kokori, who had terrorised the entire South South and South East in the past. The underworld kingpin and his dreaded syndicate were busted by op­eratives from the Inspector General of Police Special Intelligence Responses Team, SIT, led by CSP, Abba Kyari, who trailed the robbers to Sapele area of Delta State where there was an ex­change of gunfire. Imushin, Ogijo residents and com­munity leaders were apprehensive to volunteer information or comment on the recent ordeal that befell their com­munity for fear of reprisal or punish­ment by their assailants. They said the militants could come back to exact revenge for any such “careless talk.” Saturday Sun learnt that a commu­nity leader was abducted by the mili­tants a few months ago, after report­ing a case against them at the police station. A source said: “The man was in the creek for 40 days. The militants collected N10million from the com­munity before he was released. That is why everybody is afraid to talk. People have started fleeing the community. Two Hausas were killed during this attack and the Hausa com­munity has vowed to fight back.” A man, who spoke for the community, pleaded with the government to in­tervene before the community was completely deserted. We won’t take this anymore – Afenifere Reacting to the incursion by the militants into the South-West, Yoru­ba socio-cultural organisation , Af­enifere warned other ethnic groups not to take the Yoruba people for granted. The group described the unfolding development as ugly and worrisome. Speaking through its spokesman, Mr Yinka Odumakin, Afenifere be­rated the attackers who, it described as the enemies of the nation. Odumakin said the unprovoked attacks was capable of setting the na­tion on fire. While saying that the Yoruba have the capacity to defend their territory, Odumakin stressed that there was an urgent need to unmask the attackers with a view to establishing their ori­gin and whether they were truly Ijaw militants or not. ‘’We need to be very careful on this issue.We should not jump to hasty conclusion. These attacks on inno­cent people, killings and maiming and destruction of people’s property, this is very unfortunate, but we need to know the true identities of people who carry out these attacks . Who are they ? Where did they come from and What is their mission?’’ He said: “Although we are doing our own private investigations on this, security agencies have to act fast with a view to exposing these unpatriotic elements. This is neces­sary and very important, especially when you remember recent attacks and killings in some parts of the country, which people ascribe to Fulani herdsmen, but police of­ten come out to tell us that Fulani herdsmen were not involved in the killings.While security agencies are advised to beef up security in the South-West, time must not be wast­ed in knowing where these attackers came from’’. Appealing for calm,Odumakin re­vealed that leaders of Afenifere and their Ijaw counterparts have agreed to hold an emergency meeting over the issue. ‘’We are all worried, and we can’t continue to lament. We need to take concrete action. Towards this end, leaders of Afenifere and Ijaw are meeting very soon over the issue. Afenifere is also carrying out inde­pendent investigations to ascertain the true identities of the attackers’, he said’. But the Ijaw National Congress Publicity Secretary, Mr. Victor Bu­rubo, had, in a recent interview, described as “unintelligent” and lacking in facts, suggestions that his kinsmen were culprits. He said the Ijaws had nothing to do with the kidnappings and armed robbery incidents in Lagos. Borubo said it was unacceptable to say that Ijaw militants were invading Lagos and getting involved in kidnappings and armed robbery. “I don’t know the source of such intelligence and it is obvious that the so-called in­telligence is unintelligent. Those that came out with the intelligence report should come up with facts and stop accusing the Ijaw people wrongly.”

Friday, June 24, 2016

BREXIT: Cameron resigns, to step down in October — 24th June 2016 Prime Minister David Cameron announced his plan to resign following the vote for the UK to leave the EU. The Tory leader made the announcement in front of the world’s media camped outside No10 Downing Street. He had been under pressure to quit following the vote to quit the European Union. Despite more than 80 Tory MPs signing a letter saying Mr Cameron has a “mandate and a duty” to remain in post, after the vote scores of Conservatives said he couldn’t stay in Number 10 for long. Hilary Benn, Labour’s shadow foreign secretary, and Nigel Farage, the Ukip leader, were among leading opposition figures who said Mr Cameron would have to leave office. Nigel Farage has called for David Cameron to step down and said the UK needs to be led by “a Brexit Prime Minister”. The Ukip leader also called for June 23 to be declared a Bank Holiday, saying that it will “go down in our history as our independence day”. Mr Farage said: “My feeling is the Prime Minister could have risen up to the fray. He chose not to, I think he probably has to go. I think we have to have a Brexit Prime Minister.” He suggested that Boris Johnson, Michael Gove or Liam Fox would be potential leadership contenders. He accused Mr Cameron and Chancellor George Osborne of behaving in an “appalling” way during the campaign. Before the resignation, Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn said Mr Cameron should now invoke Article 50 of the Lisbon Treaty, which will kick off the two-year process of negotiating a new trade relationship with the remaining EU. The Labour leader said the PM and Chancellor George Osborne should also act urgently to stabilise the pound, ensure the continuation of investment in UK industry and begin negotiations on a new trade relationship. Labour would oppose “any urgent Budget that imposes great cuts and further austerity on people”, he added.

NEW DEADLY MILITANT CALLED RED SCORPION BLOW UP PIPELINE IN IMO STATE

Militants live up to threat, blow up pipeline in Imo — 24th June 2016 From George Onyejiuwa, Owerri Twenty four  hours after issuing a threat, group of militants, in the  early hours of yesterday,  blew up another gas pipeline owned by Shell Oil Company in the oil rich community of Awara in Ohaji/ Egbema Council Area of Imo State. Daily Sun gathered that the attack on the Shell gas pipeline was allegedly carried out by a new militant group called the Red Scorpion. The group had, on Tuesday, served a quit order on all oil companies operating in Ohaji/ Egbema and Oguta councils to evacuate the workers and leave the oil communities immediately. When contacted, Public Relations Officer of the company, Mr. Precious Okolobo said the trans Niger Pipeline which runs through Awara as the Assa Rumuekpe line has been shut for repairs since June 8, 2016, following a leak at Okolo lunch near Bonny in Rivers State. He, however, said they were investigating the incident .

Wednesday, June 22, 2016

SENATORS MOVE AGAINST BUHARI

Finally, Senators move against Buhari — 23rd June 2016 …Stall confirmation of ambassadorial nominees PDP lawmakers declare war From Fred Itua, Abuja AFTER several months of battle of wits, the Presidency- Senate frosty relationship dipped further yesterday, as the lawmakers carried through their threat to frus­trate the executive. Against population expectations, the Senate stalled the screening and confirmation of ambas­sadorial nominees sent to it by President Muhammadu Buhari. The Senate further pulled punches as it directed the Secretary to Government of the Federation (SGF), Mr. Ba­bachir Lawal and Minister of Foreign Affairs, Mr. Geoffrey Onyeama, to appear before its committee on Foreign Af­fairs to explain the processes leading to the selection of nominees before it would commence screening. The summon of the SGF and foreign minister followed a Point of Order raised by Joshua Dariye (PDP, Plateau Central) after a two-hour close-door session. While making reference to Order 42 and Order 52, Dariye said he had received complaints about irregulari­ties in the selection of ambas­sadorial nominees in Plateau State and other states of the federation. “Given the important role played by ambassadors, due diligence must be given and there should be a criteria to nominate qualified eminent Nigerians. My request is to invite the Minister of Foreign Affairs and SGF to appear before the Committee on Foreign Affairs to explain this obvious omission and irregu­larities,’’ he said. Seconding, Olusola Adeyeye (APC, Osun Central), said there was a need to ensure that the right processes were followed in the selection of the nominees. “I have been approached by three different people including one from my state with the grievance that there was a lot of irregularities with the way that the names emerged,” he noted. While Sunny Ugboji (PDP, Ebonyi), expressed concern that his state was not repre­sented in the nomination, Em­manuel Bwacha (PDP, Taraba South), said there were laid down procedures for nominat­ing career ambassadors. Said Bwacha: “What gener­ates our concern is that the list is for career ambassadors and not political ambassadors. I am in agreement with the issue raised and it should be treated holistically.’’ The Vice Chairman Senate Committee on Foreign affairs, Shehu Sani, said the commit­tee had begun investigation into the matter and urged all aggrieved persons to forward their petitions to the commit­tee. The President of the Senate, Dr. Bukola Saraki, charged the committee to expedite action on the petitions, saying screening would be suspended pending the outcome of the investigation. “A number of senators raised this observation and I have received a lot of petitions on this matter. If we say they are career ambassadors we must ensure that the process is transparent, especially as they are going to be ambas­sadors. “It is important for the foreign affairs committee to invite the minister and the SGF so that they can explain the processes that led to these names before we begin to consider the nomination,’’ he said. The committee was directed to report to the Senate in one week.

OGUN FUEL TANKER 3 KILLED. ,SCORES INURED

3 killed, scores injured in Ogun fuel tanker explosion — 23rd June 2016   By Christopher Oji THREE persons were roasted to death while several others received various degrees of fire burns when a petrol tanker exploded at Ibafo, Ogun State on the Lagos-Ibadan Expressway, Tues­day night. Witnesses said the tank­er fell when the tyre was damaged by a pothole. It was gathered that an­other truck was brought to transload the petro­leum product. A witness said: “While the owners of the tanker were transloading the product believed to be petrol, a commercial bus driver whose vehicle was smoking passed by and the tanker exploded, kill­ing seven persons while many others were burnt. “Those mostly affected were petrol black market dealers on the roadside. The incident happened Tuesday night and travel­lers were trapped in traffic gridlock that occurred till Wednesday morning” The Assistant Corps Commander, Federal Road Safety Commission (FRSC), Mowe Unit, Mr Dare Ogunjobi, said the command was yet to as­certain the casualty figure in the incident. He said: “After clear­ing the traffic, we are going to visit some of the hospitals in the neigh­bourhood to ascertain the num­ber and identities of victims and the death casualty. As at now we have not received any report on the casualties.” A driver said: “We rushed some victims including Abdul­lahi Umar, Issa Yahaya, Sallah Mu­hammed and Adam to a private hospital in the community, the doc­tor was demanding for N100,000 each for treatment”

EU MEMBERSHIP:BRITON DECIDED TODAY

EU membership: Britons decide today — 23rd June 2016 By Emma Emeozor “ DEATH to traitors, freedom for Britain.” This was the response of Thomas Mair, the gunman who killed British MP Mrs Jo Cox in broad day street attack a week ago, after he refused to give his age or address during a 15-minute extraordinary hearing held at Westminster Magistrate’s Court in central London. Certainly, the murder of Cox exposes the acrimony across Britain as the battle over the country’s continued membership of the European Union (EU) reached a climax. But can Britain free itself from EU, a process referred to as Brexit? This is the vexed question Britons will answerp today as they vote in a referendum. The referendum will ask voters whether the country should “remain a member of the European Union” or “leave the European Union.” Who is qualified to vote British citizens older than 18 can vote, as can citizens abroad who have been registered to vote at home in the last 15 years. Also eligible are residents of Britain who are citizens of Ireland or of the Commonwealth, which consists of 53 countries, including Australia, Canada, India and South Africa. Unlike in general elections, members of the House of Lords may vote, as can Commonwealth citizens in Gibraltar, a British overseas territory. Citizens of the European Union living in Britain cannot vote, unless they are citizens of Cyprus, Ireland. Tomorrow poll: Too close to call According to U.K. Telegraph newspaper report yesterday, Opinium’s final poll showed a third of the population (34 per cent) believe the economy will be “about the same” regardless of whether Britain leaves or remains in EU, with 55 per cent saying the same about their personal financial situation. With so much dissatisfaction about the availability and credibility of information about both campaigns, it’s hardly surprising that only 54 per cent say that they feel well informed about how they will vote in the referendum, the report said. Adam Drummond, Opinium Research said: “This really is ‘too close to call’ territory with undecided voters holding the balance of the vote in their hands. “Although referendum campaigns normally see a move back to the status quo as we get closer to polling day, this hasn’t yet shown up in our polls and the Remain camp will have to hope that it happens in the polling booth itself if Britain is to stay in the European Union,” he added. No more negotiation if …, EU warns If Britons vote to leave, there will be an initial two-year negotiation with the European Union about the terms of the divorce, which is unlikely to be amicable, according to analysts. However, as a sign that the EU is becoming wary of the position of the Leave camp, the President of the European Commission Jean-Claude Juncker, yesterday, warned U.K. voters that there would be no renegotiation with the European Union if they voted to leave the bloc in today’s referendum. But at Vote Leave rally in Selby yesterday, Senior Leave campaign leader Boris Johnson was quick to hit out at Juncker, angrily condemning him as an “unelected tinpot figure”. He said: “Who elected Jean-Claude Juncker to run anything in this way? Who put him in charge of us in this way? “This gives the game away. If we stay in there is no prospect of any further change. This is it, folks. We have been told from the horse’s mouth that any hope of further change is absolute illusion.” He added: “It is time for us to show our courage and our commitment to democracy by standing up to these unelected tinpot figures.” Debate over Britain’s membership not new The European Union emerged from the European Coal and Steel Community formed by six nations in 1951. Then, the object was to address the problems created by the Second World War through duty-free-trade. This body was transformed into the European Economic Community (Common Market) in 1957 through the treaty of Rome. Britain started the debate to join the Common Market way back in the 1960s. Indeed, Britain expressed its desire to join the Common Market, first, in 1963 and again in 1967. In both occasion, its bid failed because French President Charles de Gaulle vetoed its application. Even then, the debate continued with frenzy, those opposed to the Market would not stop kicking. Britain would however join the European Economic Community (EEC) in 1973 against all odds. Yet the dust did not settle as two years later (1975), there was a vote to remain in a referendum. More than 67 percent of Britons voted in favour. The Leave Camp The Justice Minister Michael Gove, and the former Mayor of London Boris Johnson lead the Leave campaigners; those who want Britain to quit the Union. Cabinet minister Michael Gove is the co-convener of the campaign’s committee. He is one of around 130 Tory MPs backing Brexit. Labour MP Gisela Stuart is the other co-convener of the campaign’s committee. He is one of only a handful of Labour MPs campaigning for Brexit. Of note is that nearly half the Conservative members of Parliament favour leaving, as do the members of the U.K. Independence Party (UKIP) and its leader, Nigel Farage. Their main issues are sovereignty and immigration. Interestingly, the battle has not been devoid of international politics and diplomacy. The move by the Leave camp immediately exposed the degree of distaste a cross section of European leaders have for the Union. For example, the French National Front leader Marine Le Pen, other anti-Europe parties in Germany, the Netherlands and elsewhere favour Brexit. They have given strong backing to the Leave camp even as their countries are members of the Union. The Remain Camp (Britain Stronger in Europe) The former Executive Chairman of Marks & Spencer is the chairman of the Remain camp (Britain Stronger in Europe), those who want Britain to remain in the EU. Other leaders are Prime Minister David Cameron, Lord Rose, Son of former Labour home Secretary Jack Straw, Will Straw. Will is the executive director of the campaign. Cameron enjoys overwhelming support of the Conservative government he leads, the Labour Party, the Liberal Democrats and the Scottish National Party, which is strongly pro-Europe. Others giving the prime minister backing include: most independent economists and large businesses, most recent heads of Britain’s intelligence services. On the international front, United States President Barack Obama, German Chancellor Angela Merkel, NATO and Chinese President Xi Jinping of China have express strong support for the Remain camp. A pain in the neck of Cameron Brexit was a major issue during the campaign for Cameron’s re-election. “To pacify his party and undermine the anti-European Union U.K. IndependenceParty, or UKIP, Mr. Cameron promised to hold the referendum should he be re-elected prime minister, “ UK media said. As the country goes to poll today, the fate of Cameron is on the balance. This is because he would have to quit office if the Leave camp wins the vote. Already, Scotland’s First Minister Nicola Sturgeon has warned that voting to leave the European Union could present the risk of a “right-wing Tory takeover”. Leave camp’s argument, outline of action Even ahead of today’s vote, the Leave camp has started “acting as an alternative Brexit government in waiting”, according to BBC report. It has reeled out its argument and outlined the immediate action it would take if Britons vote to quit the Union. It said the government should invite figures from other parties, business, the law and civil society to join the team that would negotiate with other EU members to “get a good deal in the national interest”. It called for immediate legislation in the current session of Parliament to “end the European Court of Justice’s control over national security and allow the government to deport criminals from the EU”. “After we vote Leave, the public need to see that there is immediate action to take back control from the EU,” Leave campaigner and Leader of the Commons Chris Grayling said. “We will need a carefully managed negotiation process and some major legislative changes before 2020, including taking real steps to limit immigration, to abolish VAT on fuel and tampons, and to end the situation where an international court can tell us who we can and cannot deport.” It said over subsequent sessions of Parliament it wanted to introduce: Finance Bill: This would abolish the 5% rate of VAT on household energy bills by amending the Value Added Tax Act 1994. It would be paid for by savings from the UK’s contributions to the EU budget, Vote Leave said. National Health Service (Funding Target) Bill: The NHS would receive a £100m per week real-terms cash “transfusion”, to be paid for by savings from leaving the EU Asylum and Immigration Control Bill: “To end the automatic right of all EU citizens to enter the UK.” Free Trade Bill: The UK leaves the EU’s “common commercial policy” to “restore the U.K. government’s power to control its own trade policy.” European Communities Act 1972 (Repeal) Bill: The European Communities Act 1972, “the legal basis for the supremacy of EU law in the UK”, will be repealed. “The EU Treaties will cease to form part of UK law and the European Court’s jurisdiction over the UK will end.” Remain camp argument But Chancellor George Osborne who is one of the leaders of the Remain camp disagrees with the thinking of the leaders of the Leave camp. While dismissing the Leave camp “Blueprint”, he said the UK would be left with “no economic plan” if it voted to leave the EU, requiring drastic measures such as tax rises and spending cuts to stabilize the public finances. Osborne is not alone. Cameron recently wrote: “We can choose economic security, not an unnecessary leap in the dark. We can choose to be stronger, safer and better off.” Lending his voice in support of Osborne and Cameron, a spokesman for Britain Stronger in Europe said: “The Leave campaign do not have a credible plan for Britain’s future, all they offer is a leap in the dark that will put our economy at risk.” He said leaving the EU would mean, “Years of uncertainty that will risk jobs, risk investment and lead to higher prices in the shops.”

FAYOSE! BUHARI ON REVENGE MISSION -PDP

Fayose: Buhari on revenge mission –PDP — 23rd June 2016 From Taiwo Amodu, Abuja THE Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) has reacted to the freezing of the per­sonal account of the Ekiti State Governor Ayodele Fayose by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC). Spokesperson of the Senator Ahmed Makarfi Committee, Dayo Adey­eye in a statement last night described the action of the EFCC “as politically motivated, unlawful, un­democratic, autocratic, oppressive, draconian and desperation by the Buhari administration to cover up for its failure to deliver on his campaign promises to Nigerians.” The former minister of state for works noted that events in the country in recent times had shown that President Buhari and the APC had no agenda for nation building but on a revenge mission. “This government is all out to silence any voice of the opposition. Nigerians will recall that Chief Olisa Metuh, the former na­tional publicity secretary of our great party is today standing trial for receiving campaign funds and since his arrest and prosecution by the anti-graft agency, Chief Metuh could not challenge the APC admin­istration on policy issues until he left office. “Nigerians will also recall that one of the known opposition voice apart from some individu­als and governors of our party that has exposed the APC-led administration for running the country aground in the last one year is the former spokes­man of the PDP presi­dential campaign organi­zation, Chief Femi Fani Kayode and he is now standing trial for receiv­ing campaign funds from the director of finance of the campaign. “It is now the turn of the Governor Fayose who has been consistent in condemning the woes the APC brought upon Nige­rians and for remaining critical of the APC and President Buhari’s admin­istration.” Demanding that the an­ti-corruption agency free the bank account immedi­ately, it further submitted that the action violates Section 308 of 1999 Con­stitution, as a sitting gov­ernor cannot stand trial until after office

CONTROVERSIAL GRAZING BILL REAPPEARS IN HOUSE OF SENATE

Controversial Grazing Bill reappears in Senate After an initial deni­al, the controver­sial National Graz­ing Reserves Bill on Wednesday reappeared in the Senate and sailed through the first reading. The Bill seeks to estab­lish grazing reserves for Fula­ni herdsmen across the country. The proposed law is spon­sored by Rabiu Kwankwaso, who represents Kano Central Senatorial District while its ver­sion in the House of Represent­atives is being pushed by Hon. Sunday Karim from Kogi State The Bill, which formed part of bills introduced in the Senate Order Paper of yesterday, was introduced by the Minority Sen­ate Leader, Senator Ibn Na’Allah and scaled the first reading. Similarly a second bill on the establishment of Grazing Ranches also passed the first reading. There are indications that the two bills may be collapsed into one or treated separately when they appear for second reading. The Lower House had in March passed the bill for second reading. Before its reappearance in the Upper Chamber on Wednesday, the Senate had denied ever receiving such a document. As the bill passed its first reading, the exercise did not go without the contribution of Senator Enyinnaya Abaribe (Abia State), who said it was “dead on arrival”. In April, Abaribe had kicked against the bill and sought to confirm whether it was indeed before the Senate. He had told the Senate that he was inundated with calls from his constituents on the status of the bill. The Senate President, Bu­kola Saraki, had told him then that there was no such bill be­fore the Upper Chamber. Prominent Nigerians, espe­cially governors and clergymen from the Southern part of the country and the North Cen­tral zone, have kicked against the bill. In fact, Enugu State Gov­ernor, Dr Ifeanyi Ugwuanyi, and his Benue State counter­part, Mr. Samuel Ortom, have repeatedly kicked against the bill, declaring that their states have no land to donate for the proposed ranches. Following the growing op­position to the Federal Govern­ment’s plan to set up ranches across the nation, the Minister of Agriculture, Chief Audu Ogbeh, on Tuesday said that the Mu­hammadu Buhari-led adminis­tration will not seize lands from any state to set up the ranches.

Tuesday, June 21, 2016

COURT SUMMONS SARAKI, EKWEREMADU, OTHERS FOR ALLEGED FORGERY

ALLEGED FORGERY: Court summons Saraki, Ekweremadu, others · FG re-filed dismissed suit – Investigation · South East Reps warn against assult on Ekweremadu The Federal High Court in Abuja has ended speculations over the Feder­al Government’s desire to prosecute the Senate President Bukola Saraki, the Deputy Senate President, Ike Ekweremadu and others over alleged forgery of the Upper House’s Standing Rules. Yesterday, the court formally summoned Saraki, Ekweremadu, former Clerk of the National As­sembly, Alhaji Salisu Maikasuwa and the outgoing Deputy Clerk, Ben Efeturi, over their roles in the purported forgery of the Senate Standing Order. The summons were effected through a substituted service which was pasted on the corridors along the Senate President’s office. The document read: “By oral application dated 21st June, 2016, moved by D.E. Kaswe, the Princi­pal State Counsel Federal Ministry of Justice in this case praying the court for: “An order of this Honourable Court granting leave to the com­plainant/applicant to serve the criminal summon on the defend­ants by substituted means to wit by pasting it at the Notice Board of the National Assembly Three Arms Zone, Abuja. “And after hearing D.E. Kaswe with A.A. Kaltingo Esq, counsel for the complainant/applicant moved the court orally for the above relief.” Also included in the summons were statements allegedly volun­teered by Maikasuwa and Efetu­ri on their alleged involvement in the incident. Maikasuwa, in his own state­ment, said: “The Senate Standing Orders used in the 7th Senate was not known to me. The Clerk of the Senate is in position to know. I was not aware of the amendment that was made to the Standing Rules”. Similarly, Efeturi said the Sen­ate leadership handed the 2015 Standing Rules as amended by their convention and practice to him. Meanwhile, the Senate, in its first reaction to the allegation, said the production of the Senate Rules was done by the National Assem­bly’s bureaucracy. It said: “The Rules of the Sen­ate and how the institution elects its leadership are internal affairs. The Rules of a new Senate are pro­vided by the National Assembly’s bureaucracy. It has always been so since 1999.” But investigations by The AU­THORITY have revealed that the case of alleged forgery of Senate Rules being preferred against its leadership by the Attorney-Gen­eral of the Federation (AGF) and Minister of Justice, Abubakar Mala­mi, is the same matter the minister had lost in 2015 in a court as a prac­tising lawyer. The court papers accessed by The AUTHORITY showed that Malami, in 2015, acted as one of the lawyers to the suit filed by Sen­ator Suleiman Othoman Hunkuyi against the Senate leadership. The document showed that a suit No. FHC/ABJ/CS/646/2015 filed by Senator Gilbert Nnaji and the Inspector-General of Police and the AGF as defendant/respondent and Senator Hunkuyi as applicant, that Malami was a lawyer is not dif­ferent from the one being dusted up by him. The court papers signed on August 3, 2015 showed the Justice Minister as one of the leading law­yers in the alleged forgery case, but he did not indicate his interest in the present one, pointing to a clear case of conflict of interest. Other lawyers in the case in­cluded Mike Osuman and Mike Adesina, both Senior Advocates of Nigeria (SANs) and nine other law­yers in the suit instituted by Sena­tor Nnaji. The name of the Minister of Justice is third on the list. The trial judge was Justice Ad­emola Adeniyi who eventually struck out the case. In striking out the case, Justice Ademola had said that the judiciary could not inter­fere in what took place at the hal­lowed chambers of the Senate. He referred to the case of Sen­ator Abraham Adesanya vs the Fed­eral Government of Nigeria at the Supreme Court, where the apex court upheld the concept of sepa­rations of powers. At its plenary on Tuesday, the Senate summoned Malami to ap­pear before its Committee on Ju­diciary, Human Rights and Other Related Matters on Thursday to an­swer queries on the alleged forgery of Senate Rules. The Upper Chamber specifi­cally wanted Malami to explain and justify with evidence the basis for his action and why it does not con­stitute gross misconduct, incompe­tence, contempt of court and abuse of office. It affirmed that its 2015 Rules were the authentic Rules of the Sen­ate and legally acquired from the leadership of the 7th Senate from Maikasuwa who had the honour to inaugurate and conduct the election that gave birth to the present lead­ership of the 8th Senate. However, the upper cham­ber had on resumption of plenary on Tuesday went into a two-hour closed-door session whose real ob­jectives were not immediately made known to the press. These resolutions of the Sen­ate were sequel to Orders 42 and 52 of Senate Rules, raised by Sena­tor Dino Melaye (APC-Kogi West) who said: “I take the leave of this re­spected Senate to move a substan­tive motion immediately, if I enjoy the grace of the Senate. The motion is on the imminent threat to our de­mocracy as it relates to the alleged invitation of our principal officers by the Executive in a court here in Abuja. Ekweremadu, who presided over the plenary cuts in...saying: “Is it the wish of the Senate to hear this motion immediately?” and the Senators unanimously said, “Yeah!” Melaye thereafter gave an in­sight into his motion saying: “The Nigerian Senate observed the on­going systematic degradation and abuse of office of the leadership of the National Assembly by the Exec­utive arm of government through intimidation and harassment. “This Senate notes regrettably that the Executive arm of govern­ment as presently constituted is still to come to terms with the constitu­tional tenets of Separation of Pow­ers and the independence of the legislative arm of government. “My colleagues, Mr. President, this Senate notes also the lack of re­spect for judicial decisions and the resolutions of the National Assem­bly by the Executive which is begin­ning to arrogate itself, unify powers of the federation,” he said. Seconding the motion, the Chairman, Senate Committee on Gas, Senator Bassey Akpan, said he was handed over a copy of the Con­stitution and 2015 Standing Orders during accreditation. The Chairman, Senate Com­mittee on Niger Delta Develop­ment Commission (NDDC), Sen­ator Peter Nwobosh, said there was a laid down procedure for correct­ing anything in the Senate Order. Senator Isah Misau (APC-Bauchi Central) described the cur­rent development as injustice being done to the judiciary. He insisted that it was on the basis of the Standing Orders that he was given the privilege by the Senate to ask Malami to take a bow when he came to the Senate for confirmation as minister. The Chairman, Senate Com­mittee on Services, Senator Ibra­him Gobir, said he was completely in support of the motion. South East Reps warn against as­sault on Ekweremadu Meanwhile, the South East Caucus of the House of Represent­atives has condemned what it de­scribed as serial onslaughts against the person and Office of Sen. Ekw­eremadu. The Caucus said the latest on­slaught is being carried out through trumped-up forgery charges at the Federal Capital Territory High Court. In a statement issued by the lawmakers, through the Depu­ty Minority Leader and Leader of the South East Caucus, Hon. Chuk­wuka Onyema, the group said that from what “we have read from the newspapers and other media out­lets, the charges being preferred against Senator Ike Ekweremadu in particular, and others in gener­al are charges that cannot be sus­tained in a competent court of law. “This, no doubt, leaves us with the strong impression that the Fed­eral Government and its agents within the All Progressives Con­gress (APC) are hell-bent on re­moving Senator Ekweremadu and thereby shutting out the South East from the substantive posi­tions of the Federal Government at all costs. “We are aware that it is a settled matter in law that unless there is an infraction on the constitution, the executive arm and its agencies have no right whatsoever to interfere in the internal affairs of the National Assembly,” Onyema said.